Ambedkar
Ambedkar
Ambedkar
, when 38 years of age, in 1929 at Jalgon near Nagpur declared ‘Atisudras
(Untouchables) would leave Hinduism and accept another religion in order to
avoid social injustice done to them over a period of three millennia’.
The
questions behind such declaration were:
Why
barber refuses to cut hair?
Why he
and other Mahar children were pushed out of wooden cart?
Why he
had to sit outside the class? Etc.
Ambedkar
finished his bachelor degree in arts in 1912.
The
Maharaja of Baroda granted him a scholarship to study in Columbia University,
USA. There, he completed masters and doctorate.
Then
completed his Barrister at Law in London.
1924 he
started ‘Bahishkrit Hitakarni Sabha’ to uplift the untouchables.
In 1942
started ‘Federation of All India Scheduled Castes”
He was
minister of law in the first central cabinet of free India. Thus became
chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution.
Ambedkar
felt, for the upliftment, untouchables should leave Hinduism and accept a new religion.
For him
the root of untouchability is caste.
Root of
caste is religion i.e. Brahmanical religion.
Ambedkar
was not against religion but against the cruel practices of religion.
In
October 1935, at Yeola in Nasik, he encouraged the Mahars to choose any
religion that gives them equal status and treatment.
On 12
th January 1936, at Poone conference it was decided to choose any religion even
new.
The
choice was left to Ambedkar.
He
began to study different religions as he was receiving invitation from
different religions
There
were threatening letters as well.
Ambedkar
believed ‘religion should be dynamic, not a static one’.
He
tested religions on four criteria:
1
social life based on morality
2
morality that recognizes liberty, equality and fraternity.
3
Reconciliation between science and religion.
4 religion
must not sanctify poverty.
For
Ambedkar Hinduism is far away from these criteria. He said ‘there cannot a thesis more false
than the thesis that all religions are true’.
His
view of Sikhism:
Positively
it believes monotheism, powerful community behind it, love, value of human
life, equal treatment to all adherents, solidarity for each other, disciplined,
militant community (do things).
Negatively
there is in Sikhism rigidity, inflexibility- ritual and practices.
He had
to accept their scripture. It will be
‘like shut in the structure again’.
His
positive evaluation of Islam was that it is monotheistic, community (ummah)
oriented, committed to improving human life.
The
negative reasons are it is difficult with national and global community. It
demands unquestionable surrender. It has destroyed many Hindu temples. There
was also tension between Indian national congress and Muslim League.
The
positive side of Christianity was that it accepted the outcastes. It is committed
to humanization.
Negatively
Christianity is proselytizing along the caste line (each group working with
different caste)
Increase
in number of Christianity will stiffen the British attitude in India.
Christianity
is not expressed in Indian culture ( it is simply combination of Jewish
Theology and Greek Philosophy). There are lots of denominational disputes.
Christian dogmatism may lead to authoritarianism.
In 1950
Ambedkar decided to follow Buddhism for it attracted with three principles:
1
Prajna- understanding against superstition and supernaturalism.
2
teaching of Karuna i.e. love.
3
Samata- equality.
His
conversion took place on 1956, October 13, at Nagpur (over 300 thousand).
Ambedkar
died in 1956 December, 6th.
By 1961
80% of Mahars converted to Buddhism.
The
converts were called neobuddhists. It is called Navayana or Bhimayana. It
rejected the Hinayana and Mahanayana Buddhism and followed a Buddhism explained
by Ambedkar. It rejects practices and precepts such as renouncing monk and
monasticism, karma, rebirth in afterlife, sansara, meditation, enlightenment
and four noble truths. It radically reinterpreted what Buddhism is, revises the
original Buddha teaching to be about class struggle and social equality. Ambedkar’s
book Buddha and his Dhamma is the holy book of Navayana followers.
Neo
Buddhists followed simple marriage practices, no superstition, many refused to
do traditional occupation.
Some
called Neo Buddhism as “The Ambedkar Cult”.
Reasons
for revival of Buddhism:
European
interest
Untouchable’s
revolt against Hinduism
Periyar
convened Buddhist conference in South India
In
north there were Mahabhodi Society and Mahabhodi Journal
Before
Ambedkar, in 1873 Mahatma Jotirao Phooley started ‘The Satya Shodhak Samaj
(Truth seeking society).
After
conversion disappointments. That is without economic development conversion
alone does not help. There were evils in Buddhism as well.
Comments
Post a Comment