Radhakrishnan
Dr. S.
Radhakrishnan
Born
on September 5, 1888, Tiruttani, Tamilnadu. Telugu Brahmin.
Studies
at Voorhees College, Madras Christian College –finished M.A. Philosophy in
1909.
Vice
president of India (1952-53).
President
of India from 1962
He
was a great philosopher-statesman of India.
Professor
of Philosophy in Madras, Mysore, Calcutta, Banaras and Oxford.
Known
for his two volumes on Indian philosophy
Chancellor-
university of Delhi.
Edited
translations of Bahavad Gita and Upanishads
He
wanted to defend the spirit behind all religions, and not just Hinduism.
He
believed that nothing but a spiritual revival can cure the present distempers
of the world.
The ancients stood on scriptural revelation
but Radhakrishnan maintained the religious experience of the saint’s sages and
mystics belonging to various traditions all over the world.
This
is to defend the faith of mankind against science etc.
He
said that the Hindus alone can think of all religion son equal footing.
His
lectures on “An idealist view of life” (1929), published in 1932 give his
thoughts on religion and philosophy.
He
talks about metaphysical or absolute idealism and not subjective idealism.
On
the basis of absolute idealism he evaluated all philosophical systems.
For
him Absolute Idealism finds its highest expression in the schools of Vedanta.
(Highest experience that man is capable of).
He
defines philosophy of religion as religion come to an understanding of itself.
Philosophy
of religion is an attempt to organize and unify the data of religious
experience.
Philosophy
of religion proceeds from religious experience.
There
can be no religious philosophy without religious experience.
Religious philosophy is different from
speculative theology where god only a possibility.
Dogmatic
theology restricts itself to express one set of experiences recorded in a
particular age and country.
Witness
to the personal sense of the divine are not confined to the East. It is as old
as humanity. It is not confined to any one people.
Spiritual
experience is:
Reaction
of the whole man to the Reality
It
is integral intuition
It
reveals the Absolute which is beyond thought and expression.
We
get the knowledge of the unity of the world (universal spirit)
It
is kinship between soul and God
Our
union with God is intermittent hence religion helps us.
Mystics
use different symbols to explain their religious experiences, we need to get
beyond these symbols.
Religion
cannot be substituted even by morality.
Mere
absolutism i.e. world as revelation of the nature of absolute, deprives man of
his freedom.
From
idealist point of view:
Man
is a self conscious being
He
is able to look before and after
He
can dominate the nature and increase knowledge yet he is not absolutely
individual.
He
is organically related to his environment
Harmony
between him and his environment has to be achieved voluntarily and consciously.
His
true progress lies in employing his own unique gifts for the benefit of all.
Otherwise
he does violence to himself and commits sin.
Thus
man is free to mend or mar himself.
Still
he is limited by his connection with his own past (Law of Karma).
The
doctrine of rebirth is more reasonable than the denial of rebirth.
Because
the way of nature is one of continuity.
The
goal of perfection cannot be reached in one life.
How
do we remember the past?
Death
may destroy the memory of our deeds, but not their effect on us.
He
opines that human body cannot take birth in a body so entirely foreign to its
enveloped characteristics.
Ultimate
destiny of human personality is higher than mere survival.
But
to reach God consciousness.
Salvation
is nothing but the fullest development of the mystic consciousness.
It
is a rising from ethical individualism to spiritual universalism.
True liberation implies harmony within the
self and harmony with the environment.
God
must precede the world, if the values that emerge from it have any reality.
The
world is a mixture of truth and
illusion.
Therefore,
life here is worth if it is directed by spiritual ideal.
Love
belongs to the very core of God.
Radhakrishnan
envisaged a new world.
The
soul of that world is a feeling of
brotherhood among all nations ;
A
spirit of cooperation in the pursuit of
common peaceful aims;
International
fellowship;
Universal
toleration.- it is the sacred duty of the intellectuals of all the nations.
His
religious ideal was not for a single world religion (It is dream of
proselytizing religions, it is impossible).
But
commonwealth of religions having their own creeds and organizations and living
side by side with mutual toleration and respect as representing the one
religious spirit of man.
Great
religions developed in restricted areas (intercourse was difficult)
Now
they are approximating to one another ( because of developments)
There
for untenable doctrines are not so much refuted.
Radhakrishnan compare Hinduism to the British commonwealth
of free nations or university.
Hinduism
seeks unity of common quest and not common creed.
Unity
of spirit and not unity of organizations.
Creeds,
prophets and churches are only means not ends in themselves.
The
spirit behind all religions is the same.
Christianity
and Islam are propagandist world religions.
They
say others are imperfect r error.
Their
zeal caused many wars, much bloodshed and cruelties of various kinds.
Thus
he asked “Have we the right to destroy what we have not learnt to appreciate?
A
religion which develops harness of heart is hardly worth the name.
In
his (Kamala Lecture) “Religion and Society”
he mentions about Hindus that;
Hindu civilization continue to flourish in
spite of wars etc, because it places
spiritual values above others.
Hindu
view of dharma permits change i.e. dogmas and institutions, customs and rules
which have lost their validity have to be scrapped and replaced by new
ones. Otherwise the march of the spirit
would be impeded.
We
have to start from the past and proceed
Life
is complex hence be charitable in applying code
old/new.
While
supporting Hindu practices he opposed animal sacrifice, deva dasi system.
He
condemned caste, untouchability.
Upanayana
should be extended to all
Temple
priests should be properly educated.
He
called for liberalization of marriage laws. Divorce should be permitted in
certain cases.
Comments
Post a Comment